Technol Health Care. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. The number of mechanically ventilated ICU patients meeting communication criteria. Nurse—patient communication interactions in the intensive care unit.
Augmentative and alternative communication. Accessed 1 Jan Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. J Eval Clin Pract. Int J Surg. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews.
Lancaster: Lancaster University; Williams ML. An algorithm for selecting a communication technique with intubated patients. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. Serving nonspeaking patients in acute care settings: Intervention outcomes. Augment Altern Commun. Effect of a multi-level intervention on nurse-patient communication in the intensive care unit: results of the SPEACS trial.
Comparison of two types of communication methods used after cardiac surgery with patients with endotracheal tubes. Adler JJ, Zeides J. Evaluation of the electrolarynx in the short-term hospital setting.
Care Critically Ill. Ewing DM. Electronic larynx for aphonic patients. Am J Nurs. Electronic voice-output communication aids for temporarily nonspeaking patients in a medical intensive care unit: a feasibility study. Patient communication following head and neck cancer surgery: a pilot study using electronic speech-generating devices.
Oncol Nurs Forum. The patient requiring mechanical ventilatory support: use of the cuffed tracheostomy "talk" tube to establish phonation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
Preliminary report of laryngeal phonation during mechanical ventilation via a new cuffed tracheostomy tube. Respir Care. Voice intensity of patients using a Communi-Trach I cuffed speaking tracheostomy tube. Leder SB. Verbal communication for the ventilator-dependent patient: voice intensity with the Portex "Talk" tracheostomy tube. Verbal communication for the ventilator-dependent patient requiring an inflated tracheotomy tube cuff: A prospective, multicenter study on the Blom tracheotomy tube with speech inner cannula.
Head Neck. Gaze-controlled, computer-assisted communication in intensive care unit: "speaking through the eyes". Minerva Anestesiol. A prospective evaluation of speaking tracheostomy tubes for ventilator dependent patients. Summers J. The use of the electrolarynx in patients with temporary tracheostomies. J Speech Hear Disord. The electrolarynx improves communication in a selected group of mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: a feasibility study.
Intensive Care Med. A new communication aid for mechanically ventilated patients. Connect World Crit Care Nurs. Use of the artificial larynx during airway intubation. Speech in an orally intubated patient. N Engl J Med. Speaking tracheostomy tube and modified mouthstick stylus in a ventilator-dependent patient with spinal cord injury. Case Rep Emerg Med. Optimizing communication in mechanically ventilated patients. J Med Speech Lang Pathol. Communicating by electrolarynx with a blind tetraplegic spinal cord injury patient on mechanical ventilation in the ICU.
Spinal Cord. A pilot study of eye-tracking devices in intensive care. Evaluation of Speak for Myself with patients who are voiceless. Rehabil Nurs. Computer-assisted communication for critically ill patients: a pilot study. J Trauma. ICU-talk, a communication aid for intubated intensive care patients. Serving nonspeaking patients in acute care settings: an intervention approach.
Stomal complications and airflow line problems of the Communi-Trach I cuffed talking tracheotomy tube. Liu H, Ng ML. Electrolarynx in voice rehabilitation. Auris Nasus Larynx. Voice communication app for ICU patients. Top 10 alternative and augmentative communication tools. McNaughton D, Light J. The iPad and mobile technology revolution: benefits and challenges for individuals who require augmentative and alternative communication.
Communicating with ventilator dependent patients. Support Center Support Center. External link. Please review our privacy policy. Question forms for assessment: communication experiences during intubation period, and evaluation of communication process.
Communication board was helpful Patak, [ 17 ]. Structured interview with 13 questions, self-developed: level of frustration without and if a communication board had been available. Frustration in communication would have been lower if a communication board had been offered Stovsky, [ 30 ].
Open-end patient interview Satisfaction questionnaire Visual analog scale on satisfaction with communication. Kluin, [ 36 ]. Kunduk, [ 37 ]. Success in phonation e. Leder, [ 40 ].
Leder, [ 39 ]. Voice intensity levels, obtained using a digital sound level meter Subjective assessment by SLP. Leder, [ 38 ]. See Leder, [ 39 ]. Mitate, [ 48 ].
Talked 10 min with Vocalaid, with fatigue inadequate for communication. Mouthstick stylus fixed on maxilla made communication possible with a communication board and an iPad touchscreen. Pandian, [ 49 ]. All achieved adequate phonation. With two cases someone else had to occlude the thumb port needed for phonation. Sparker, [ 42 ]. Adler, [ 31 ]. Subjective assessment of improved communication by SLP good, fair, or poor.
Ewing, [ 33 ]. Daily written evaluation Patient and staff questionnaire to determine quality, ease of use, and preference for device. EL was preferred by both patients and staff over other communication methods lip movement, sign language, writing EL was: most comfortable, easiest to use, and clearest for self-expression.
Girbes, [ 47 ]. Shimizu, [ 50 ]. The patient gradually became better able to speak fluently and could be understood on the first day of EL use. Summers, [ 43 ]. Tuinman, [ 44 ]. Mixed diagnosis.
For two patients it improved lip-reading EES 3 The intra-oral type was used successfully in one patient. Wu, [ 46 ]. Diagnosis unknown. Subjective evaluation of improved communication excellent, good, or failure. Happ, [ 34 ]. Happ, [ 35 ]. Tracheostomized patients following surgical procedures for head or neck cancer. Etchels, [ 32 ] MacAulay, [ 54 ]. Garry, [ 51 ].
All patients were able to communicate basic needs to nursing staff and family. Koszalinski, [ 52 ]. Three open-ended questions that asked if the patient users liked or disliked using Speak for Myself.
Maringelli, [ 41 ]. Internally developed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires, one per each group patients, physicians, nurses. Miglietta, [ 53 ]. Questionnaires with graded responses 1—5 related to ease of use and perception of improvement in comfort and anxiety days 1, 3, and 7.
Rodriguez, [ 19 ]. Patients mainly following surgery for head or neck cancer Type of intubation unknown. Usability of communication intervention form every day Patient satisfaction and usability instrument prior to discharge.
Communicating effectively with ventilator-dependent patients is essential so that various basic physiological and psychological needs can be conveyed and decisions, wishes, and desires about the plan of care and end-of-life decision making can be expressed. High-tech alternative communication devices are available for more complex cases. Various options for patients with a tracheostomy tube include partial or total cuff deflation and use of a speaking valve.
Sign In or Create an Account. Advanced Search. User Tools. Sign In. Skip Nav Destination Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article navigation. Volume 31, Issue 3. Previous Article Next Article. J Palliat Med ; Das D. A study to assess the effectiveness of communication pattern among patients on mechanical ventilator in Bombay hospital at Indore in the year IJAR ; Egyptian J Chest Dis Tuberc ; Lazarus R, Cohen JB.
Environmental Stress. Human Behavior and Environment. New York: Springer US; Gay,Nancy A. Collop Critical Care Explorations. Collop Chest. Dale Journal of Critical Care. Zaga,Sue Berney,Adam P. Advanced Search Users Online: Year : Volume : 23 Issue : 5 Page : The effect of using communication boards on ease of communication and anxiety in mechanically ventilated conscious patients admitted to intensive care units. Iranian J Nursing Midwifery Res ; Table 1: Comparison of participants' characteristics according to study groups Click here to view.
Table 2: Comparison of communication and anxiety scores before and after the intervention in control and experimental groups Click here to view. This article has been cited by.
Ensuring communication access for all during the COVID pandemic and beyond: supporting patients, providers, and caregivers in hospitals. International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances. Barriers to and facilitators for the use of augmentative and alternative communication and voice restorative strategies for adults with an advanced airway in the intensive care unit: A scoping review.
0コメント